I can't believe this shit!!!!!

  • warzone (nov 5-9) signup begins in...

gram green

ILLIEN
ill o.g.
Battle Points: 1
MIKELABZ said:
NAW FUCK THAT... THATS LIKE ME STARTING A BEAT AND HAVING TO GET UP OUTTA MY CHAIR SO SOME OTHER PRODUCER CAN FINISH IT... BULLSHIT...THE BEAT WOULD COME OUT ALL FUCKED UP...


first off son your beats might come out alot better if some other producer did sit down in your chair to finish it..... not unlike the war....


black republicans kill me
 
M

MIKELABZ

Guest
Formant024 said:
MIke.....blessed are those who dont know ( the ignorant ).

If this moron continues to develop his dritte Reich like this I'm bound to make Adolf Hitler man of the year. Shit, this aint 19 fuckin' 38...


1. WAR IN IRAQ

yeah right...that's a good thing...by the time the war is really over there will be no Iraqies left on the continent except the Sunnites probably.

2. OCCUPATION OF IRAQ

Xsqueeze me... Dont you watch the news...Iraq is far from being free and to say that he has occupied the country is wishful thinking...Saddam is gone indeed but that doesn't mean the country has been liberated. Occupied ? They landed in the troops, got rid of Saddam and after that the US army's being headshot and naded like it's a counterstrike fragfrenzy...one by one... Occupation comes with control, domination and acceptance.

3. RE-ELECTION CAMPAINING

Like he gives a shit..., veni, vidi, vici and they got jack shit... no oil or weapons... they got revenue though... after blasting shit to pieces Iraq can pay for construction contracts to rebuild the country...yes, thank you mr Bush and thank you Halliburton and Carlyle for putting our infrastructure back together and Bush thanks Iraq for raising the value of his shares and obligations...they got 2/3 of the population that isn't able to vote...but elections still have to go on...how you call that democratic ? Being able to vote in 5 or 6 cities ? Rumsfeld didn't seem to bother, in fact he'd rather see the UN clear that mess up so he can play golf with the rest of the hawks.

4. GETTING RE-ELECTED

Yes, the world is happy now and there's credit for the man who finaly made peace in the middle east...what next ??? A nobel prize ? He aint no fucking nelson mandela...The Iron triangle runns america and you dont even know it but I can point out a few who're happy about him being re-elected starting with those who live in the US... the rest of the boardmembers a spread out across the globe; Carlucci, Baker, Darman, Rubenstein, Rumsfeld, Cheney...Ramon, Major, Karl Otto Poehl, King Fahd and theres like 50 other partners, boardmembers and advisers contributing to their personal wealth on behalf of this war and other since President Carter. Not just any people with a nice resume and intelligent abilities...they're all former goverment officials or industrial multinational directors or ceo's... all powerfull player...even more powerfull after being an government official. Shit's over your head so I can Imagine a soul like you wouldn't know hard facts.

5. RESIGNATION OF CERTAIN CABINET MEMBERS

They weren't invited to the carlyle board ...Powell was the only non hawk between all the heads that runn under bush... Think about it.

6. REPLACING THEM

Carlyle consultance or republican muppets...people without opinions in general.

7. PLANNING A WAY TO GO ABOUT MAKING IRAQ TERROR FREE

hehehe....


e....




hehe, there's more terror than ever, anyone can make a planning a way to go about, in fact any country that hasn't got ties to Carlyle and Halliburton has probably made the effort, they call that joint effort the United Nations but they weren't invited.

8. PLANNING A WAY TO EXPORT THE OIL AT PRICES THAT ARENT JACKED UP BY SADDAM'S REGIME....

Like Saddam is to blame for that, in fact... even if so, it was his damn country and his right to make such a decision. I personaly think that overconsuming is the cause to the oil prices, I mean all countries use oil but only in the US you could get cheap gasoline to keep the public happy ( and pollute half the world ). If prices were to par alike the rest of the world then the US would definitly be wiser with their oil reserves... but hey, Iceland is already running public transports on water the only reason Bush wont ever invest in that is simply because it kills his and his friends wallet.


Befor even bother replying you might want to read a bit of the links below and tell me you didnt know because the next reply on your junior politics will definitly be over you head.

http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Political_Corruption/Big_Guns.html
http://www.uni-muenster.de/PeaCon/imagination/i-texte/Bush-Carlyle.htm


ONCE AGIAN IT WASNT MOST POPULAR PERSON OF 2004... IT DEALT WITH THE PERSON WHO HAD MOST POWER AND MOST WORLD WIDE RECOGNITION...GOOD OR BAD... NOWHERE DOES IT SAY... PERSON THAT FORMANT LOVES TO CRITICIZE MOST... THE FUCK DOES TIME MAGAZINE CARE ABOUT PEOPLE'S OPINIONS... THEY WENT BY THE FACTS AND WHAT HE'S DONE IN A YEAR...THEY BANK ON PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME DEBATING IT.. CAUSE FOR MEDIA TO BE SUCCESFUL IT HAS TO INTRIGUE YOU... THEY DIDNT GO BY POSITIVE POPULARITY..,. THEY WENT BY THE PERSON THAT EVERYBODY WAS EFFECTED/INFLUENCED BY WHETHER THEY LIKED IT OR NOT... AND IN THAT CASE, U CANT BEAT BUSH...
 

Formant024

Digital Smokerings
ill o.g.
I can beat bush senseless he just aint ever gonna come near me or vice versa.

I displayed facts, it's not up to me to "critisize" and yeah...Time magazine, I don't think Peoples Magazine could come up with the idea of making Mel Gibson a nominee because he played Jezus more bloody shockingly then Saving Privat Ryan's landing on D-Day ( Besides, Jezus was black, Will Smith would've have done a more convincing job ). And Rove...common...why not spielberg, tarantino or scorcese. Moore, no indeed I couldn't see him winning cuz it just fit this sceneria...it's propaganda... just like hitler in '37/'38/'39... when they were in fear and financial dispair.
 
M

MIKELABZ

Guest
Formant024 said:
I can beat bush senseless he just aint ever gonna come near me or vice versa.

I displayed facts, it's not up to me to "critisize" and yeah...Time magazine, I don't think Peoples Magazine could come up with the idea of making Mel Gibson a nominee because he played Jezus more bloody shockingly then Saving Privat Ryan's landing on D-Day ( Besides, Jezus was black, Will Smith would've have done a more convincing job ). And Rove...common...why not spielberg, tarantino or scorcese. Moore, no indeed I couldn't see him winning cuz it just fit this sceneria...it's propaganda... just like hitler in '37/'38/'39... when they were in fear and financial dispair.


BUSH IS NO HITLER. THATS FOR SURE. BUSH HAS CHANGED THE PLAYING TABLE FOR GOOD. THERES NO DENYING IT. THE WORLD WILL NEVER BE THE SAME. WILL SMITH CAN COME OUT WITH A THOUSAND MOVIES AND WILL STILL NEVER HAVE THAT ABILITY THAT GEORGE BUSH HAS.
 

Formant024

Digital Smokerings
ill o.g.
It's difficult to read...I compared Will to Mel, not to Bush...

Are you saying Hitler didn't make indefinite changes ?

Hey....Pick up some history classes...educate yourself...
 
M

MIKELABZ

Guest
Formant024 said:
It's difficult to read...I compared Will to Mel, not to Bush...

Are you saying Hitler didn't make indefinite changes ?

Hey....Pick up some history classes...educate yourself...

ACTUALLY U WERE COMPARING MEL AND WILL TO BEING INFLUENTIAL AND TO BEING POSSIBLE PERSON OF THE YEAR NOMINEES...AND THATS WHERE I STEPPED IN AND SAID... WILL SMITH (OR EVEN MEL GIBSON) CAN NEVER COMPARE TO THE AMOUNT OF INFLUENCE GEORGE BUSH HAS GAINED IN ONE YEAR... SO WHILE U THINK I NEED HISTORY LESSONS... YOU NEED A BETTER GRASP OF FILTERING PARAGRAPHS... WHAT DO THEY CALL THAT?... O YEA... READING COMPREHENSION... READ BEFORE U TYPE...
 

Formant024

Digital Smokerings
ill o.g.
I didn't say they were influential, I actually placed the context to show the opposite...and delibaritly did not compare two actors with Bush to show they dont belong with the context...even if they mentioned in the threadstarter....

Now again, explain me to why this era of Bush is nothing alike the times of hitler...talking methods of politics.
 
M

MIKELABZ

Guest
Formant024 said:
I didn't say they were influential, I actually placed the context to show the opposite...and delibaritly did not compare two actors with Bush to show they dont belong with the context...even if they mentioned in the threadstarter....

Now again, explain me to why this era of Bush is nothing alike the times of hitler...talking methods of politics.

BUSH ISNT A JEW.
BUSH DIDNT SET-UP DEATH CAMPS.
BUSH DOESNT RESIDE IN GERMANY.
BUSH HAS NO FACIAL HAIR.
BUSH ISNT A BRUNETTE.
BUSH DIDNT GO TO WAR WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM, RUSSIA, THE UNITED STATES, AND FRANCE.
BUSH DIDNT COMMIT SUICIDE AT THE WAR'S END.

POLITIC WISE-

BUSH DIDNT USE THE LOW MORALITY OF THE NATION TO STAGE A HATE WAR AGAINST PEOPLE LIVING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF HIS COUNTRY.

BUSH DIDNT CREATE DEATH CAMPS FOR ARABS LIVING IN THE UNITED STATES.

BUSH DIDNT RULE AS A DICTATOR, HIS PEERS VOTED HIM IN...

BUSH DIDNT PROCEED TO TAKE OVER STATES THAT WERE PREDOMINANTLY DEMOCRAT THROUGH FORCE...
 
Top