I know bout 3/4 the people on here use FL and i was wandering if u were too work for Imageline (the People Who Make FL) wot would U change in the latest 1? Or ot would u add? Me personnally i'd change the mixer make it look a lil more proffessional and change the FX. Id make it so u can extract audio from CD and make the wave editor a lil more powerful 4 samplin. Oh ye and get rid of FL Keys and Slayer and make em more quality
FL Studio. Would U Change It?
- Thread starter bassic
- Start date
-
Beat This!The next Beat This! Competition is from November 27-28th!
Formant024
Digital Smokerings
ill o.g.
I would like to see the option to switch serial or parallel between 2 filters in the channel setting instead of 1. Single Q though and perhaps assignable to either filter 1 or 2.
Improvement on LFO sync in channel settings.
Channel setting Arpeggio split on pianoroll, set keyranges ( or zones ) with pitch and velocity for arpeggio in order to enable a multiple variety of the available patterns from one instrument.
Advanced cut group options.
A decent gate vst.
A comp/lim/gate vst with side chaining ( sidechaining anyway would be nice ).
A syncable analogue tape delay with lp/hp filter.
Option to set arpeggio to a different scale opposed to master scale ( 4/4 but arp does 3/4 for example ).
Support for instruments that need to have multiple outputs to assign over available asio channel, i.e. RM IV wont work because it needs to snatch available asio channels during init leaving the stereo only to be assigned .
Improvement on LFO sync in channel settings.
Channel setting Arpeggio split on pianoroll, set keyranges ( or zones ) with pitch and velocity for arpeggio in order to enable a multiple variety of the available patterns from one instrument.
Advanced cut group options.
A decent gate vst.
A comp/lim/gate vst with side chaining ( sidechaining anyway would be nice ).
A syncable analogue tape delay with lp/hp filter.
Option to set arpeggio to a different scale opposed to master scale ( 4/4 but arp does 3/4 for example ).
Support for instruments that need to have multiple outputs to assign over available asio channel, i.e. RM IV wont work because it needs to snatch available asio channels during init leaving the stereo only to be assigned .
massikrbeats
ILLIEN
ill o.g.
Battle Points: 1
I would change how it starts up....
Girls in bikinis would run across the screen and scream "oh Fame, the beat you're about to make will be so bangin! Hurry up so you can be famous and we'll be there for you in real life"
Then it would quickly go away once the wifey hears all the ruckus..,plus it will automatically delete the porn and IM conversations off my computer..hehehehe
Girls in bikinis would run across the screen and scream "oh Fame, the beat you're about to make will be so bangin! Hurry up so you can be famous and we'll be there for you in real life"
Then it would quickly go away once the wifey hears all the ruckus..,plus it will automatically delete the porn and IM conversations off my computer..hehehehe
O
open mind
Guest
BIG LOL!!!! that would be sick! i wuold support that haahah.
O
open mind
Guest
just right click on the green button/light in the mixer window to solo a channel.
Kontents
I like Gearslutz
ill o.g.
Battle Points: 5
T
TheMost
Guest
IM buying that tomorrow
lion-ucs
ILLIEN
ill o.g.
It already has a search feature
right click in the browser, hit "smart find in this folder"
They change the name fruity loops to FL Studio.
It was called fruity loops when it was only a drum sequencer.
If you stop calling it fruity loops others may too.
O
open mind
Guest
just lie and tell them u use CUBASE and then they will STFU! HAAHAH.
do you any of you remember Fruity Tracks? This was FL's attempt at a more industry standard feel for sequencing. I think much of the functionality has been put in the playlist. I would like to see a more robust playlist though. I think it would be better to base the playlist on "Channels" instead of "Patterns." This way you could have Channels that had much more functionality where you can assign different patterns, drag and drop wave files, assign mixer tracks, etc. Kinda like Sonar/Audition, etc.
NorthJack ENT.
ILLIEN
ill o.g.
I would make it soo u can add midi out to a mixer channel soo u can add effects to it just like in Ableton Live and Logic and Cubase.....I would make the Fpc better I would make it have 4 banks soo it can be just like an mpc and u can edit audio inside of it with out having to use edison u would be able to edit the start and end point it would have timestrectch on it, it would have pitch on it (Instead of tune), it would have 16 levels chromatically and velocity wise....